Well...the party of wealth and obscene power is chosing to eat it's leaders and it's base
Last night, I heard Ariana Huffington suggest as one Oxbridge PhD to another that she and Rachel Maddow be put in charge of rehabilitating the Republican party because they both are committed to a two party system and because they are women and therefore more compassionate. I thought that was hilarious, but in the cold light of morning, it looks pretty good. Frankly, somebody has got to do something with these assholes.
I'm not talking about Batshit McCrazy. As the testosterone induced high of competition settled down, he's taken a look at what he's done, shuddered metaphysically, and is moving on to do what he has tried to do in his various incarnations -- serve the nation. I'm talking about a particular class of Republicans, a lot of whom seem to be tied to Dixie. We are seeing a bit of regional "Drop Dead" from these guys, and the psuedo-populism aside, I find it instructive. And, maddening -- at times, it strikes me that some of the Republicans are locked into a Pickett's Charge Mentality, only they have no Lee to say, "It's all my fault. We must gather our wounded and return to Virginia..." They have nothing but battle maddened reactionaries, babbling insanely about charging the hill again. If at times in the past 44 years the Democratic party has resembled the Children's Crusade, the party of the rich and powerful have been driven by a "God Wills It!" approach that is bloodier and more destructive but ultimately no less futile.
As I was driving around the installation yesterday, coming back from a government franchised Starbucks that isn't quite for lunch, my buddy and I started talking about my next car. I had been thinking about a Challenger, or maybe one of the new Camaros, or possibly the newest version of the Mustang in 2010. It was kind of sad to think that a muscle car guy had to now think about...BMWs. "Maybe an older 911." "No, but I make enough to easily handle a Boxster.." But, damnit, I don't want a goodamn Boxster! For everything wrong about the US, and anyone who's reading this knows that I'm pretty vocal about that aspect of things, I'm an American. And, if they have something I'd like to drive, I'd rather drive an American car. Frankly, looking forward to driving a Boxster excites me about as much as listening to a Swedish Band covering the Standells...speaking of which, for your viewing pleasure..
You see, they do it well, but they just don't quite get it...
The attitude toward the bailout for the car countries is instuctive. The center-left coalition that is the mainstream of the Democrats is interested in saving the economy from itself, but is not excited about status quo ante. The conservative-extremist-flat earth-troglodyte coalition that appears to be the ruling mob in the Republican party is interested in preaching it's ideology. Bob Herbert has a lovely (in the very Irish sense of the word, see Barry Fitzgerald discussing the burning of the Squire's house in The Quiet Man )characterization of the Big Three in today's column:
It’s easy to demonize the American auto industry. It has behaved with the foresight of a crack addict for years. But even when people set their own houses on fire, we still dial 9-1-1, hoping to save lives, salvage what we can and protect the rest of the neighborhood. (AXE emphasis)
Now, a great many of the ideologically driven Republicans are really pissed off at the Bush administration's utterly upgefucked leadership and handling of the $700 billion dollar bailout, and equally pissed off at the indications that they put us incrementally on the hook for a lot more. Well, I don't blame them. However, while I find the banking industry and the finance industry interestingly awful in so many ways, that doesn't really translate to this. I can't feel too sad for the poor bastards at Merrill Lynch who lost a lot of paper wealth; I can feel really bad for some guy in a Detroit blue collar neighborhood who's worked for GM for 40 years and now watches his health care, pension and pride go away...I can feel really bad for the guy in Barstow who's a lead mechanic at the GM dealer who watches his subordinates get laid off and is told he has to take a 20% pay cut. (True story -- guy could come work for me, by the way -- except he has to have a high school degree. He has 20 current ASE certifications, which aren't easy to get. But, 30 years ago he dropped out of school and went to work. Worked hard. Saved his money. Did everything he was supposed to do...and now this.)
Hey, I'll stipulate that I have some self-interest here. My brother-in-law is an autoworker. He gets up at 3:30 in the morning, drives two hours to Romulus and then works as many hours as he can; he drives home, kisses my sister and goes to sleep. He's been doing this since the early 70s; suffered through layoffs until he got some seniority; relocated to Michigan when they closed the factory in Syracuse; has raised a couple of really good kids and gotten them through college and launched on careers. He did everything he's supposed to do...and with almost 40 years seniority and close to retirement, he's sweating about things that the power structure told him not to sweat about. He's been a life-long Republican, trying to hang on to the American dream of being in the middle-class. And, he feels abused and violated, and angry. Yet, he's still proud to make engines. He's excited about some of the innovation. He's disgusted that Pontiac has looked to fucking Australia for its rear wheel drive salvation.His only gripe with me is that I have never used the Friends and Family discount program through his benefits...and, he's proud of his company's products.
Shelby et al do have a possible dog in this hunt. There are a lot of cars manufactured in Alabama, for example. They just aren't made by the big 3 -- they're made by Honda, Hyundai, and Mercedes among others. These companies pay well, because they are using economics to keep the UAW out. They went to places like Alabama, Mississippi and South Carolina to avoid the UAW. In talking to acquaintances in work force development from Alabama, Honda really has to pay a premium because of the way their company culture conflicts with the Alabamian (the resemblance to Albanian just struck me) culture. Both white and black workers are made to feel inferior to the mighty Japanese. But, the Koreans and the Germans get along fine with the workers...so, I could picture some local boosters saying, hey if GM goes, we'll profit.
Yeah. Well, that's just stupid. Not surprisingly short sighted of course -- the Babbits of the world, the Sarah Palins and the Grover Norquists and the Alan Greenspans are as fucked up as the big 3 have been. The foresight of crack addicts is a marvelous line...ideologues are very close to crack addicts. From Tim McVie or Trotsky Palin or Norquist isn't a big jump. But the flow from Buckley and Goldwater to Palin and Norquist is almost infinite. They say the words, but the words don't mean the same things.
Herbert begins his column with a discussion of the famous "Ford to city: DROP DEAD" approach to NYC fiscal crisis in the mid-70s. It took a woodshedding by world leaders to wake him up; there is a connection between the country and it's largest and most important city. If one fails, the other suffers. Well, in much the same way, there is a connection between our biggest manufacturing industry and the rest of the country. If it fails, then we're probably going to really suffer.
There is an opportunity here but in the financial realm and the manufacturing realm. Equity stakes are not the same as "nationalization." For the loans already outstanding and being misused, call the notes back and take serious equity stakes and conditions that serve the national interests. For manufacturing, equity stakes and serious, serious efforts to focus again on the national interests. Which, I think, are jobs that pay well, innovation, and technological leadership. Herbert's summation is clear and reasonable...
That means dragging the industry (kicking and screaming, no doubt) into the 21st century by insisting on ironclad commitments to design and develop vehicles that make sense economically and that serve the nation’s long-term energy security requirements.
What I would like to see is creative thinking on both ends of the bargain. Let the smartest minds design a bailout that sparks a creative revolution in the industry. Think of it as project synergy. (AXE emphasis: But, I am starting to get a little concerned about the whole Best and the Brightest trend. People who cite it ought to re-read Halberstram's book. It wasn't exactly positive...humility would be a good idea.)
Time’s wasting.( AXE Comment:And, the vultures are circling...)




























Recent Comments